So here are my questions about it: From our friend Tim Greve at NW Armory:
Was he using a high capacity gun? Did he pay for the ammo, or did we taxpayers pay for the ammo? Did we taxpayers pay for the range master and other officers that needed to accompany him?
If he paid for the ammo, which we doubt, then could that be construed as the "lease or rental" of a firearm, which under the bill he testified for would have required a background check? Also, since he was a resident of another state, he wouldn't have been allowed to do a background check/transfer to borrow the handgun under the newly proposed legislation as we understand it.
www.facebook.com/pages/Oregon-Firearms-Federation/...ef=ts
No comments:
Post a Comment