In the Supreme Court of the United States 10-1470

QUESTIONS PRESENTED:
In this action, the respondent custodial mother (Erica Ewing) in a divorced family reverted to her maiden name and obtained a name-change order for the three minor children from a trial court in an ex parte proceeding by submitting a false affidavit with respect to the father’s support for and involvement in the children’s lives. When he learned of the change, the father re-opened the proceeding and obtained a reversal of the original order. The mother did not
advise the children of the reversal of the falselyobtained name change, and, at trial, the court found that the children’s time under the falsely-obtained name contributed to their best interest in retaining that name, going forward. In doing so, the trial court rejected controlling Oregon Supreme Court precedent as based on outdated"social mores.” The
Oregon Court of Appeals (Ellen Rosenblum) affirmed without decision, and the Oregon Supreme Court denied review.
certpool.com/dockets/10-1470
#scotus #orpol #orcot #lnyhbt #tcot #oregoncourts #oregoncircuitcourts #oregonattorneygeneral #timmcmenamin #mcmenamin4or #stopthecorruption


https://chumly.com/n/290acc4

In the Supreme Court of the United States 10-1470

TIMOTHY EDWARD MCMENAMIN, PETITIONER, v. ERICA MCMENAMIN, RESPONDENT.
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
In this action, the respondent custodial
mother in a divorced family reverted to her maiden
name and obtained a name-change order for the
three minor children from a trial court in an ex parte
proceeding by submitting a false affidavit with
respect to the father’s support for and involvement in
the children’s lives. When he learned of the change,
the father re-opened the proceeding and obtained a
reversal of the original order. The mother did not
advise the children of the reversal of the falsely obtained
name change, and, at trial, the court found
that the children’s time under the falsely-obtained
name contributed to their best interest in retaining
that name, going forward. In doing so, the trial court
rejected controlling Oregon Supreme Court
precedent as based on outdated"social mores.” The
Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed without decision,
and the Oregon Supreme Court denied review.
www.leagle.com/decision/In SCO 20111003P37
#scotus #orcot #tcot #oregon #orpol #oregoncourt #oregonattorneygeneral #timmcmenamin


https://chumly.com/n/28c232e

An act deliberately ensuring that more children will grow up motherless or fatherless is not an act of love

I am deeply grieved by Judge Michael McShane's ruling to redefine marriage. It is a travesty of justice that marriage, as the foundation of society, received no defense in the U.S. District Court. Attorney General, Ellen Rosenblum, in an extreme dereliction of her sworn duty to uphold the law, refused to represent the interests and the people of Oregon. It is a sad day for democracy when one federally appointed judge can overturn, without any representation, the express will of the people of Oregon.
www.oregonunitedformarriage.org/SCOTUS

Supreme Court denies motion to stay marriages for same-sex couples in Oregon

June 4th, 2014 The U.S. Supreme Court has weighed in, and moments ago, the nation’s highest court just served NOM a flat out rejection of their motion to issue a stay and halt marriages for same-sex couples in Oregon. An act deliberately ensuring that more children will grow up motherless or fatherless is not an act of love. I am deeply grieved by Judge Michael McShane's ruling to redefine marriage. It is a travesty of justice that marriage, as the foundation of society, received no defense in the U.S. District Court. Attorney General, Ellen Rosenblum, in an extreme dereliction of her sworn duty to uphold the law, refused to represent the interests and the people of Oregon. It is a sad day for democracy when one federally appointed judge can overturn, without any representation, the express will of the people of Oregon.
www.oregonunitedformarriage.org/SCOTUS

Oregon Fatherless Day Rally Friday the 13th June 2014 Oregon State Capital Salem

Show your support in the reform of Parental Rights and Equal Shared Rights for Parents. There are too many parents that have been alienated from their children, Its time we make a change. Children Need Both Parents! Make Shared Parenting Happen Now in Oregon!! Show Your Support For Legislatures and Candidates That You Support Shared Parenting in Oregon. Send a message to Senator Floyd Prozanski (D-Eugene) That We Want Shared Parenting in the January 2015 session. No More Parental Alienation! Salem, Oregon Noon to 5 PM. Friday June 13th.

Mr. McMenamin failed to cite the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

It is a travesty of justice that marriage, as the foundation of society, received no defense in the U.S. District Court. Attorney General, Ellen Rosenblum, in an extreme dereliction of her sworn duty to uphold the law, refused to represent the interests and the people of Oregon. It is a sad day for democracy when one federally appointed judge can overturn, without any representation, the express will of the people of Oregon. Redefining marriage confuses the true purpose and meaning of marriage. An act deliberately ensuring that more children will grow up motherless or fatherless is not an act of love. How does a Federal Judge overturn Oregon's Constitution sighting Violation of The Fourtenth Amendment and Our Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum will not do her job. When Ms. Rosenblum voted against the 14th Amendment when she served on the Oregon Court of Appeals. JURISDICTION::
This action concerns non-custodial parents’
due-process rights in legal matters that affect their
children generally and those rights in the context of
the custodial parent’s decision to change the
children’s names specifically. Pet. at 2. Ms. Ewing
protests that this Court lacks jurisdiction to hear
these issues because Mr. McMenamin failed to raise
them below. Resp.’s Br. at 2, 15-20. The entire
proceeding below concerned three due-process issues:
(1) Ms. Ewing’s benefiting from her false affidavit
stating that Mr. McMenamin had neither
supported nor resided with the children;
(2) Ms. Ewing’s failure to serve or notify Mr.
McMenamin of her name-change petition; and
(3) The trial court’s failure to follow the Oregon
Supreme Court’s binding precedent.
The jurisdictional question that Ms. Ewing asks –
but answers incorrectly – is whether these dueprocess
issues constitute a federal question if Mr.
McMenamin failed to cite the Due Process Clause of
the Fourteenth Amendment.
plus.google.com/100073774932782445025/posts/dww6r4...BQZYp

From the Oregon Catholic Conference on today's ruling

"The Oregon Catholic Conference is deeply grieved by Judge Michael McShane's ruling to redefine marriage. It is a travesty of justice that marriage, as the foundation of society, received no defense in the U.S. District Court. Attorney General, Ellen Rosenblum, in an extreme dereliction of her sworn duty to uphold the law, refused to represent the interests and the people of Oregon. It is a sad day for democracy when one federally appointed judge can overturn, without any representation, the express will of the people of Oregon.
Despite the judge's ruling, authentic marriage remains what it has always and only been according to God's design: the loving union between one man and one woman for the mutual benefit of the two who have become one flesh and any children born of their union. Redefining marriage confuses the true purpose and meaning of marriage. An act deliberately ensuring that more children will grow up motherless or fatherless is not an act of love. The Oregon Catholic Conference will continue to uphold the true meaning of marriage and advocate for genuine marriages and families in Oregon, and it urges all people of good will to continue to reject the flawed notion that a pairing of two people of the same gender constitutes a marriage. "

Mr. McMenamin failed to cite the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

How does a Federal Judge overturn Oregon's Constitution sighting Violation of The Fourtenth Amendment and Our Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum will not do her job. When Ms. Rosenblum voted against the 14th Amendment when she served on the Oregon Court of Appeals. JURISDICTION::
This action concerns non-custodial parents’
due-process rights in legal matters that affect their
children generally and those rights in the context of
the custodial parent’s decision to change the
children’s names specifically. Pet. at 2. Ms. Ewing
protests that this Court lacks jurisdiction to hear
these issues because Mr. McMenamin failed to raise
them below. Resp.’s Br. at 2, 15-20. The entire
proceeding below concerned three due-process issues:
(1) Ms. Ewing’s benefiting from her false affidavit
stating that Mr. McMenamin had neither
supported nor resided with the children;
(2) Ms. Ewing’s failure to serve or notify Mr.
McMenamin of her name-change petition; and
(3) The trial court’s failure to follow the Oregon
Supreme Court’s binding precedent.
The jurisdictional question that Ms. Ewing asks –
but answers incorrectly – is whether these dueprocess
issues constitute a federal question if Mr.
McMenamin failed to cite the Due Process Clause of
the Fourteenth Amendment.
plus.google.com/100073774932782445025/posts/dww6r4...BQZYp

Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum won't Defend The 14th Amendment To The US Costitution!!

In The Supreme Court 10-1470:
Nothing new Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum supports Fraud and "out-dated social norms". In this action, the respondent custodial mother (Erica Ewing) in a divorced family reverted to her maiden name and obtained a name-change order for the three minor children from a trial court in an ex-parte proceeding by submitting a False affidavit with respect to the father’s support for and involvement in the children’s lives. When he learned of the change, the father re-opened the proceeding and obtained a reversal of the original order. The mother did not
advise the children of the reversal of the falsely obtained name change, and, at trial, the court found that the children’s time under the falsely-obtained name contributed to their best interest in retaining that name, going forward. In doing so, the trial court rejected controlling Oregon Supreme Court precedent as based on outdated"social mores.” The Oregon Court of Appeals (Ellen Rosenblum) affirmed without decision, and the Oregon Supreme Court denied review.
www.oregonlive.com/mapes/index.ssf/2014/02/oregon_...river

Parents Want To Raise Their Children Not Visit Them!

'Taken into Custody' exposes the greatest and most destructive civil rights abuse in America today. Family courts and Soviet-style bureaucracies trample basic civil liberties, entering homes uninvited and taking away people's children at will, then throwing the parents into jail without any form of due process, much less a trial. Read more...www.stephenbaskerville.net/default