In the Supreme Court of the United States 10-1470

QUESTIONS PRESENTED:
In this action, the respondent custodial mother (Erica Ewing) in a divorced family reverted to her maiden name and obtained a name-change order for the three minor children from a trial court in an ex parte proceeding by submitting a false affidavit with respect to the father’s support for and involvement in the children’s lives. When he learned of the change, the father re-opened the proceeding and obtained a reversal of the original order. The mother did not
advise the children of the reversal of the falselyobtained name change, and, at trial, the court found that the children’s time under the falsely-obtained name contributed to their best interest in retaining that name, going forward. In doing so, the trial court rejected controlling Oregon Supreme Court precedent as based on outdated"social mores.” The
Oregon Court of Appeals (Ellen Rosenblum) affirmed without decision, and the Oregon Supreme Court denied review.
certpool.com/dockets/10-1470
#scotus #orpol #orcot #lnyhbt #tcot #oregoncourts #oregoncircuitcourts #oregonattorneygeneral #timmcmenamin #mcmenamin4or #stopthecorruption


https://chumly.com/n/290acc4

In the Supreme Court of the United States 10-1470

TIMOTHY EDWARD MCMENAMIN, PETITIONER, v. ERICA MCMENAMIN, RESPONDENT.
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
In this action, the respondent custodial
mother in a divorced family reverted to her maiden
name and obtained a name-change order for the
three minor children from a trial court in an ex parte
proceeding by submitting a false affidavit with
respect to the father’s support for and involvement in
the children’s lives. When he learned of the change,
the father re-opened the proceeding and obtained a
reversal of the original order. The mother did not
advise the children of the reversal of the falsely obtained
name change, and, at trial, the court found
that the children’s time under the falsely-obtained
name contributed to their best interest in retaining
that name, going forward. In doing so, the trial court
rejected controlling Oregon Supreme Court
precedent as based on outdated"social mores.” The
Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed without decision,
and the Oregon Supreme Court denied review.
www.leagle.com/decision/In SCO 20111003P37
#scotus #orcot #tcot #oregon #orpol #oregoncourt #oregonattorneygeneral #timmcmenamin


https://chumly.com/n/28c232e

Ignore the busybodies!

That’s my advice after learning that Oregon’s attorney general, Ellen Rosenblum, and attorneys general representing 27 other states and territories, have signed a letter to big pharmacy chains, including Rite Aid, Walgreens, Kroger, Safeway and Walmart, calling on them to stop selling tobacco products in stores that also have pharmacies. Following the line of thinking that it is immoral or contradictory for these businesses to sell tobacco products alongside healthcare products, are the attorneys general as outraged over all these company’s stores also selling tooth-decaying candy, life-destroying alcohol, and snacks like Twinkies that are contributing to an epidemic of obesity? And good grief, what about guns? WalMart sells guns. Talk about something that can ruin your health.
thinkingoregon.org/2014/03/17/ignore-the-busybodie...odies

Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum won't Defend The 14th Amendment To The US Costitution!!

In The Supreme Court 10-1470:
Nothing new Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum supports Fraud and "out-dated social norms". In this action, the respondent custodial mother (Erica Ewing) in a divorced family reverted to her maiden name and obtained a name-change order for the three minor children from a trial court in an ex-parte proceeding by submitting a False affidavit with respect to the father’s support for and involvement in the children’s lives. When he learned of the change, the father re-opened the proceeding and obtained a reversal of the original order. The mother did not
advise the children of the reversal of the falsely obtained name change, and, at trial, the court found that the children’s time under the falsely-obtained name contributed to their best interest in retaining that name, going forward. In doing so, the trial court rejected controlling Oregon Supreme Court precedent as based on outdated"social mores.” The Oregon Court of Appeals (Ellen Rosenblum) affirmed without decision, and the Oregon Supreme Court denied review.
www.oregonlive.com/mapes/index.ssf/2014/02/oregon_...river